Insights
Frontier model or open weights? A framework for regulated data
When patient records cannot leave the country, "just call an API" stops being an answer, and the model choice should never harden into the codebase.
- Published
- Reading time
- 2 min read
By Fineteklabs Engineering
The default advice on AI projects is to use a hosted frontier model. For many projects that is right. For health, financial services, defence and public sector work it is often not available, because the data is constrained to a jurisdiction.
Start with the data, not the model
Split the workload by what it touches. Non-sensitive material can use any hosted model. De-identified operational data usually can, under a processor agreement. Patient records, payment credentials and classified material often cannot leave at all.
The choice should stay reversible
The most useful decision is refusing to let model choice harden into the codebase. A thin inference gateway in front of every model makes moving from hosted to self-hosted a configuration change rather than a rewrite.
The pattern we ship
For restricted workloads: a small self-hosted model on-premise for sensitive extraction and classification, with a hosted model only on de-identified or public material.
Topics
- AI transformation
- Data protection
- Architecture
Keep reading
Related reading
Let’s talk
Let’s engineer your next advantage.
Tell us what you are trying to achieve. You will speak to an engineer, not a call centre.
Monday to Friday, 08:00 to 18:00 East Africa Time (GMT+3). Urgent support by arrangement.